the ideal ends of the state are the abolition of state / the ideal ends of mind are the abolition of mind

personally I believe that the state is inicimal to society because everything the state does is based on the threat of force whereas proper and non-abusive social relationships are based on mutual consent, still, the state can be applied towards the ends of the abolition of state (in an ideal world) in much the same way that a meditator used the mind as a bridge to go beyond the mind, some practice is given to the mind in which it slowly abolishes it's control over the true self until the true spirit, whose essence can not be accurately labelled by the intellect, emerges through the cracks.

personally I believe that the state is inicimal to society because everything the state does is based on the use of force, or the threat of force, whereas proper, non-abusive social relationships are based on mutual consent. still the state can theoretically be applied towards the ends of the abolition of state in much the same way that a meditator used the mind as a bridge to go beyond the mind, some practice is given to the mind in which it slowly abolishes it's control over the true self until the true spirit, whose essence can not be accurately labelled by the intellect, emerges through the cracks. only once spirit is allowed to supercede mind will social anarchism supercede the coersive state, "as above, so below".